<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attribute &#8216;rel=nofollow&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow</link>
	<description>Your guide to links and linking</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Available Domain Names</title>
		<link>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-11529</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-11529</guid>
					<description>I agree about the nofollow. I did not realise this and did some blog lins and before I knew it, the page was showing at position 64 in google (I know that's not great but it was a difficult phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about the nofollow. I did not realise this and did some blog lins and before I knew it, the page was showing at position 64 in google (I know that&#8217;s not great but it was a difficult phrase.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Standard Mischief &#187; Lexicon: Google-fu</title>
		<link>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-11078</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 04:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-11078</guid>
					<description>[...] Compare Google Juice [1] [2] [3] or The nofollow attribute [1] [2] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Compare Google Juice [1] [2] [3] or The nofollow attribute [1] [2] [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jenn&#8217;s Other Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using (and Abusing?) rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; to Preserve Page Rank</title>
		<link>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-10721</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-10721</guid>
					<description>[...] LinkTutorial.com: Attribute &amp;#8216;rel=nofollow&amp;#8217; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] LinkTutorial.com: Attribute &#8216;rel=nofollow&#8217; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: thanatos10</title>
		<link>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-10081</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-10081</guid>
					<description>if all search engines are supporting the rel=nofollow why is that yahoo still considers nofollow links as inbound links?

tried using site explorer and tried looking to our competitors inbound links and in my shock found thousands of inbound links from blogs, and what irks me is all of their comments are spam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if all search engines are supporting the rel=nofollow why is that yahoo still considers nofollow links as inbound links?</p>
<p>tried using site explorer and tried looking to our competitors inbound links and in my shock found thousands of inbound links from blogs, and what irks me is all of their comments are spam!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: villas</title>
		<link>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-8906</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-8906</guid>
					<description>It is still a debate whether NOFOLLOW links are useless. Some people still believe that they are beneficial for Link Popularity but do not pass any PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is still a debate whether NOFOLLOW links are useless. Some people still believe that they are beneficial for Link Popularity but do not pass any PR.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-5078</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-5078</guid>
					<description>My main concern is that you can't guarantee every page of your website will be included in the SERPs. Considering I'm constantly adding new products to my company's website, I need to be sure that customers can find them as soon as possible.http://www.seoptimizerz.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main concern is that you can&#8217;t guarantee every page of your website will be included in the SERPs. Considering I&#8217;m constantly adding new products to my company&#8217;s website, I need to be sure that customers can find them as soon as possible.http://www.seoptimizerz.com
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: john becks amazing profits</title>
		<link>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-712</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.linktutorial.com/read/articles/attribute-relnofollow#comment-712</guid>
					<description>It feels as if this attribute is throwing the baby out with the bath water. Certainly, as a blog owner, I have no desire to have my blog filled with comments from spammers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It feels as if this attribute is throwing the baby out with the bath water. Certainly, as a blog owner, I have no desire to have my blog filled with comments from spammers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
